Tensions have been growing among those who support and protest the controversial new citizenship law
criticized for excluding Muslims in the capital of India, Delhi. Indian Prime
Minister Narendra Modi called for calm. The number of those who lost their
lives rose to 27.
Local media in Delhi wrote that some Hindu
groups target Muslims and burn their homes and shops. Some Muslims have left
their homes. Both mosques were around in the city. Among the dead are both Muslims and Hindus.
A police officer also died in the incidents.
The law,
which was approved and enacted by the Indian Parliament, and granted
citizenship rights to all refugees from South East Asia, except Muslims, has
been criticized for reasons such as "violating India's secular
constitution" and "excluding Muslims" because of its
relationship between religious rights.
It has been
decades before Delhi witnessed such violence. The escalation of events that
Hindus and Muslims have faced in the past few days brings to mind some of the
bloody social events in the recent past and creates anxiety.
In 1984,
about 3 thousand people lost their lives in the violent incidents that occurred
after the murder of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi by the Sikh guards.
At the root
of recent events lies the law that grants refugees the right to citizenship,
but its opponents have accused the BJP government, which has been in power
since 2014 and has been increasing the number of votes in the elections last
year, for discriminatory policies against Muslims for years.
What is there in the law accused of discrimination?
The law,
passed through the Indian Parliament in December, grants citizenship to members
of 6 religious groups who fled illegally from neighboring countries Bangladesh,
Pakistan and Afghanistan provided that they have been living there for six
years.
The only
exception to this right in the law is Muslims.
The ruling
Hindu nationalist BJP government says it is intended to grant legal status to
those "fleeing religious oppression" by law, that Muslims are not
religious minorities in the mentioned countries and therefore do not need
protection from India, so they are not included in the law.
Muslim groups
in the country argue that the regulation is part of the government's policy of
excluding Muslims and that the constitutional principle of secularism is
broken.
The United
Nations also voiced concern about discrimination by law.
The number
of Muslims, who make up 14.2 percent of the population in India, is close to
180 million.
It is not
the only practice that raises the concerns of the Muslim community about the
policies of the Narendra Modi government in the country, which has the second
largest Muslim population in the world.
Article 370 about Jammu Kashmir
The
province of Kashmir in the Himalaya region in northern India remains the
subject of dispute between India and Pakistan. India, the old life of Britain, was
divided into two as India and Pakistan in the period when it gained its
independence in 1947 and Kashmir was also divided in the war that broke out in
the meantime.
Both India
and Pakistan claim rights over the entire Kashmir region, and both countries
control part of the region.
With the
Article 370 of the Constitution of India, the autonomy of the province, which
is predominantly Muslim, was guaranteed.
The
cancellation of Article 370 of the BJP government, led by Modi in 2019, caused
great reactions and social resistance.
The
previous governments have also opened up Kashmir's special status to
discussion, but the stage of making such a change has never been reached.
However,
the BJP removed this item within a few months by strengthening its support in
the elections, the Kashmir valley was closed, it was taken under the control of
the Indian army and blackout was applied in the field of media and
communication for months.
With the
cancellation of Article 370, it was suggested that the government aimed to
change the demographic structure in the region by granting the right to settle
and buy land that would migrate from other regions to the non-Muslim
population.
The subject of citizenship registration
In the
state of Assam, in the northeast of India, there is a list of citizenships with
people who have proved that they arrived in India before March 24, 1971, when
Bangladesh left Pakistan and was established as a separate state. In fact,
this list was launched during the Congress Party government, which came to
power in 1951 with the first democratic elections in India.
However,
the Modi government ranked "detecting illegal immigrants" as its top
priority.
Inline
with this practice, people living in the state of Assam were asked to bring
documents proving their family background, and it was announced that those who
could not prove their citizenship would be seen as illegal foreigners.
Assam is
India's most ethnically diverse state; One-third of the 32 million population
is Muslim. This rate constitutes the largest rate for the Muslim population
after Kashmir under the Indian administration.
Muslims say
the state and the federal government target themselves directly with this
practice.
According
to the latest data, 1.9 million people in Assam were discharged from
citizenship with the application of citizenship registration, but they were
also given the right to appeal.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you have any questions, please let me know.